Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 21;5(4):txab214. doi: 10.1093/tas/txab214

Table 3.

Effects of beef genotypes and finishing system on meat quality and sensory attributes (mean and lower and upper confidence limit at 95%)

Item Genotype1 System Year
RA AK GRASS GRAIN 2019 2020
Water holding capacity
 Thawing loss, % 1.0(0.9 − 1.1) 1.0(0.9 − 1.0) 1.1 (1.0 − 1.2) 0.9 (0.8 − 1.0) 0.8 (0.8 − 0.9) 1.2 (1.1 − 1.4)
 Cooking loss, % 22.7(21.7 − 23.8) 23.2(22.1 − 24.2) 22.4(21.5 − 23.2) 23.6(22.4 − 24.8) 22.4(21.5 − 23.3) 23.5(22.3 − 24.7)
Color
 Lightness (L*) 33.2(32.3 − 34.1) 33.6(32.7 − 34.5) 29.4 (28.7 − 30.1) 37.9 (36.7 − 39.0) 36.0 (35.1 − 36.9) 30.9 (30.0 − 31.9)
 Redness (a*) 21.0(20.4 − 21.7) 21.1(20.5 − 21.8) 23.2 (22.5 − 23.8) 19.1 (18.5 − 19.8) 17.8 (17.3 − 18.3) 25.0 (24.1 − 25.9)
 Yellowness (b*) 21.1(20.6 − 21.5) 21.0(20.6 − 21.5) 21.5 (21.1 − 21.9) 20.6 (20.1 − 21.1) 17.3 (17.0 − 17.6) 25.6 (25.0 − 26.2)
 Hue angle 44.9(44.4 − 45.4) 44.8(44.3 − 45.4) 42.8 (42.3 − 43.2) 47.1 (46.4 − 47.7) 44.1 (43.6 − 44.6) 45.7 (45.2 − 46.3)
 Chroma 29.9(29.2 − 30.6) 29.9(29.1 − 30.6) 31.6 (31.0 − 32.3) 28.2 (27.4 − 29.0) 24.9 (24.3 − 25.4) 35.9 (34.9 − 36.9)
Shear force2
 WBSF, kg 4.1(3.8 − 4.3) 4.2(4.0 − 4.5) 4.6 (4.4 − 4.8) 3.7 (3.5 − 4.0) 3.7 (3.5 − 3.9) 4.6 (4.3 − 5.0)
Sensory3
 Flavor—liking 5.9 (5.6 − 6.1) 5.8(5.6 − 6.1) 5.5 (5.3 − 5.7) 6.2 (6.0 − 6.5) 6.0 (5.7 − 6.3) 5.7 (5.4 − 6.0)
 Juiciness—liking 5.5(5.3 − 5.8) 5.8(5.6 − 6.1) 5.4 (5.1 − 5.6) 6.0 (5.7 − 6.2) 5.6 (5.3 − 5.9) 5.7 (5.4 − 6.0)
 Texture/firmness—liking 6.0 (5.8 − 6.3) 5.9(5.7 − 6.1) 5.5 (5.3 − 5.7) 6.4 (6.2 − 6.7) 6.0(5.7 − 6.2) 5.9(5.7 − 6.2)
 Overall acceptability 5.9(5.6 − 6.1) 5.8(5.6 − 6.0) 5.4 (5.1 − 5.6) 6.3 (6.1- 6.6) 6.0 (5.7 − 6.3) 5.7 (5.4 − 6.0)

1RA = Red Angus; AK = Red Angus x Akaushi crossbred.

2WBSF = Warner–Bratzler Shear Force.

3Sensory: Panelists assigned steak attributes using 9-point scales (1 = dislike extremely; 9 = like extremely) for flavor, juiciness, texture/firmness, and overall acceptability.

Bold values indicate that the main effect was statistically different (P < 0.05). P-values are shown in Supplementary Table S2.