Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 8;7(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s40854-021-00300-x

Table 9.

COVID-19 risk and the likelihood of loan default: testing for sampling bias

Variables DV = DEFAULT
(1) (2) (3)
Panel A: Three big countries by the number of observations
PANDEMIC_ DUMMY

0.405***

(0.008)

DAILY_CASES

0.004***

(0.000)

DAILY_DEATHS

0.045***

(0.001)

Loan originator individual effects Yes Yes Yes
Controls Yes Yes Yes
Pseudo-R-squared 0.210 0.235 0.237
N 680,694 390,133 390,133
Panel B: Bootstrap sampling
PANDEMIC_ DUMMY

0.555***

(0.007)

DAILY_CASES

0.004***

(0.000)

DAILY_DEATHS

0.036***

(0.001)

Loan originator individual effects Yes Yes Yes
Controls Yes Yes Yes
Pseudo-R-squared 0.129 0.173 0.170
N 814,872 503,167 503,167
Panel C: Only unresolved loans
PANDEMIC_DUMMY

0.387***

(0.010)

DAILY_CASES

0.007***

(0.000)

DAILY_DEATHS

0.067***

(0.001)

Loan originator individual effects Yes Yes Yes
Controls Yes Yes Yes
Pseudo-R-squared 0.274 0.345 0.347
N 288,595 213,036 213,036
Panel D: Heckman correction
PANDEMIC_DUMMY

0.088***

(0.001)

DAILY_CASES

0.001***

(0.000)

DAILY_DEATHS

0.003***

(0.000)

Loan originator individual effects Yes Yes Yes
Controls Yes Yes Yes
N 814,886 503,167 503,167

Table presents the results of regression analyses based on four panels. Panel A results are for logit regression analysis for the likelihood of loan default (DEFAULT) with the sample consisting of only three countries with the highest number of observations. Panel B reports the results after the application of bootstrap sampling with stratified sampling based on loan originators and each month of 2020. Panel C results are for logit regression analysis with the sample consisting of only unresolved loans. Panel D reports the results after the application of the Heckman selection model, where the selection in the sample is instrumentalised with loan amount and rating. All model specifications employ robust standard errors in parentheses (*p < 0.10, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01)