Skip to main content
. 2000 Apr;38(4):1651–1655. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.4.1651-1655.2000

TABLE 1.

Profiles of CF isolates used in the studya

Patient or reference Data of isolation B. cepacia isolate Ribopattern EPS [g of total sugar · (g of cell protein)−1]b
A S
A August 95 IST401 2 0.24 ± 0.09 4.30 ± 0.11
A September 95 IST404 3 ND 0.60 ± 0.06
B April 95 IST402 1 ND 0.80 ± 0.08
B April 95 IST409 1 ND 1.1 ± 0.5
C February 95 IST403 7 ND 0.10 ± 0.02
D December 95 IST407 3 ND ND
E December 95 IST406 2 0.36 ± 0.02 2.5 ± 0.20
F January 95 IST408 2 0.39 ± 0.01 2.20 ± 0.15
G April 95 IST405 4 ND ND
G June 95 IST410 5 ND ND
G February 95 IST411 6 ND ND
H January 97 IST412 1 ND 0.50 ± 0.04
H March 97 IST413 1 ND 0.80 ± 0.02
H May 97 IST414 1 ND 0.80 ± 0.06
H July 97 IST415 1 ND 0.80 ± 0.09
I September 97 IST416 8 ND 0.40 ± 0.02
Type strain ATCC 25416 12 ND 4.00 ± 0.20
11 J2315 11 ND ND
23 C1394 9 ND ND
27 C1579 10 ND 0.50 ± 0.01
a

CF patient hosts are identified by letters. Ribopatterns are shown in Fig. 3

b

EPS produced (expressed as grams of total sugars present in the ethanol-precipitable material per gram of cell protein) after 5 days of incubation at 30°C on the surface of A or S solid medium by B. cepacia isolates. ND, not detectable.