Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 8;6:729453. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.729453

TABLE 2.

Statistical analyses underpinning the results.

Esults section Variables compared Statistical result
3.1.2 Nakuru economic and socio-environmental conditions Chi2 test of Employment status and Neighbourhood χ2 (10) = 28.191, p = 0.002
One-way Anova comparison of Objective Wellbeing Score between Kaptembwo and Shabab F (5, 506) = 3.282, p = 0.006
One-way Anova comparison of Women’s Objective Wellbeing Score by Neighbourhood F (5, 242) = 3.396, p = 0.006
3.1.3 Udon Thani economic and socio-environmental conditions Chi2 test of Tenancy status and Neighbourhood χ2 (6) = 26.810, p < 0.001
One-way Anova Objective Wellbeing Scores and Neighbourhood F (6, 299) = 10.817, p < 0.001
3.2.2 Udon Thani Subjective Wellbeing One-way Anova comparison of SWEMWBS by Neighbourhood F (6,271) = 2.16, p = 0.047
One-way Anova comparison of Older (61 + yrs) and younger people’s Perceived Stress Scores Difference in mean PSS of +1.6. F (3,583) = 5.59, p = 0.01
One-way Anova comparison of Older (61 + yrs) and younger people’s SWEMWBS Difference in mean SWEMWBS of -1.9. F (3,583) = 7.35, p = 0.01
3.2.3 Inter-city comparison One-way Anova comparison of PSS between Nakuru and Udon Thani F (11,136) = 194.33, p < 0.0005
One-way Anova comparison of SWEMWBS between Nakuru and Udon Thani F (11,136) = 1.039, p < 0.308
3.3.1.1 Nakuru Greenspaces Kruskal-Wallis test of difference in NDVI pixel values by neighbourhood Pixel Range Sig
Values 0–9 0.086
Values 10–19 0.000
Values 20–29 0.000
Values 30–39 0.000
Values 40–49 0.000
Values 50–59 0.000
Values 60–69 0.000
Values 70–79 0.000
Values 80–89 0.001
One-way Anova correlation between NDVI values and neighbourhood affluence F (11,136) = 1.039, p < 0.308
Chi2 association between neighbourhood and living within walking distance of a greenspace χ2 (5) = 21.951, p = 0.0005
Chi2 association between neighbourhood and use of greenspace by surveyed residents χ2 (5) = 2.980, p = 0.703
One-way ANOVA comparison of change in SWEMWBS with more than 2 h s time spent in greenspace F (1,290) = 4.677, p = 0.031
One-way ANOVA comparison of change in PSS with average greenness of neighbourhoods from NDVI pixel values F (5,252) = 3.417, p = 0.005
3.3.1.2 Nakuru Public Realm Spaces Chi2 association between neighbourhood and public space walking distance accessibility χ2 (5) = 19.189, p = 0.002
Chi2 association between availability of walking distance public space and use χ2 (5) = 21.951, p = 0.0005
3.3.1.3 Nakuru Environments Effects on Mood t-test of change in men’s hedonic tone pre- and post- transect walk for those who ended in the public park (pre-mean = 21.41; post-mean = 22.38) (t (31) = –2.142, p = 0.040)
3.3.1.4 Udon Thani Greenspaces Kruskal-Wallis test of difference in NDVI pixel values by neighbourhood Pixel Range Sig
Values 0–9 0.154
Values 10–19 0.013
Values 20–29 0.001
Values 30–39 0.102
Values 40–49 0.080
Values 50–59 0.002
Values 60–69 0.002
Values 70–79 0.034
Values 80–89 0.999
Chi2 association between neighbourhood and living within walking distance of a greenspace χ2 (6) = 103.845, p = 0.000
Chi2 association between neighbourhood and use of greenspace by surveyed residents χ2 (6) = 37.056, p = 0.000
3.3.1.5 Udon Thani Public Realm Spaces Chi2 association between neighbourhood and public space walking distance accessibility χ2 (6) = 65.664, p = 0.000
3.3.1.6 Udon Thani Environments Effects on Mood t-test of change in all participants hedonic tone pre- and post- transect walk for those who ended in the public park (pre-mean = 23.74; post-mean = 22.32) t (64) = 3.908, p = 0.000