Table 3.
Summary of treatment response
| Regimen M Afatinib (20 mg) + TMZ + RT N = 7 | Regimen M Afatinib (30 mg) + TMZ + RT N = 6 | Regimen M Afatinib (40 mg) + TMZ + RT N = 7 | Regimen M Afatinib (total) + TMZ + RT N = 20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best overall response, n (%) | ||||
| CR | 0 | 1 (17) | 0 | 1 (5) |
| PR | 2 (29) | 2 (33) | 0 | 4 (20) |
| SD | 5 (71) | 2 (33) | 4 (57) | 11 (55) |
| PD | 0 | 1 (17) | 1 (14) | 2 (10) |
| Missing | 0 | 0 | 2 (29) | 2 (10) |
| Objective response, n (%) | 2 (29) | 3 (50) | 0 | 5 (25) |
| Disease control rate, n (%) | 7 (100) | 5 (83) | 4 (57) | 16 (80) |
| Regimen U afatinib (20 mg) + RT N = 3 | Regimen U afatinib (40 mg) + RT N = 13 | Regimen U afatinib (total) + RT N = 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best overall response, n (%) | |||
| CR | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PR | 0 | 1 (8) | 1 (6) |
| SD | 1 (33) | 7 (54) | 8 (50) |
| PR | 2 (67) | 3 (23) | 5 (31) |
| Missing | 0 | 2 (15) | 2 (13) |
| Objective response, n (%) | 0 | 1 (8) | 1 (6) |
| Disease control rate, n (%) | 1 (33) | 8 (62) | 9 (56) |
CR complete response, PD progressive disease, PR partial response, RT radiotherapy, SD stable disease, TMZ temozolomide