Table 1.
Descriptive statistics of the sample (N = 363 respondents).
| Characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Endogenous variables | |
| Overall quality of life (M ± SD) | 3.67 ± 0.535 |
| General health status (M ± SD) | 3.45 ± 0.665 |
| Leisure-time physical activity levels (MET·min·wk−1) (Med; Q1–Q3) | 2,166.0 (1,310.9; 3,129.0) |
| Travel-related physical activity levels (MET·min·wk−1) (Med; Q1–Q3) | 802.0 (456.0; 1,347.0) |
| Explanatory variables | |
| Socio-Demographic characteristics | |
| Male (1 if true, 0 otherwise) (%) | 47.7 |
| Aged 75 years or older (1 if true, 0 otherwise) (%) | 36.9 |
| High education (1 if high school or higher, 0 otherwise) (%) | 38.0 |
| Severe physical limitations (1 if true, 0 otherwise) (%) | 9.4 |
| Presence of grandchildren under 12 in household (1 if true, 0 otherwise) (%) | 19.6 |
| Neighborhood characteristics | |
| Live in the inner city (1 if true, 0 otherwise) (%) | 35.0 |
| High accessibility to local shops (1 if <10 min, 0 otherwise) (%) | 73.6 |
| Ln distance to the nearest park (M ± SD) | 7.1 ± 0.7 |
| Satisfied with neighborhood aesthetics (1 if true, 0 otherwise) (%) | 47.4 |
| Satisfied with footpath conditions (1 if true, 0 otherwise) (%) | 84.8 |
| Satisfied with traffic safety (1 if true, 0 otherwise) (%) | 47.7 |
| Satisfied with crime safety (1 if true, 0 otherwise) (%) | 70.8 |
| High social capital (1 if with a lot of friends or neighbors) (%) | 41.0 |
| Good social cohesion (1 if true, 0 otherwise) (%) | 73.8 |