Table 3.
Status Anxiety Model 1 | Status Anxiety Model 2 | Subjective Well-Being Model 1 | Subjective Well-Being Model 2 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictors | Estimates | CI | p | Estimates | CI | p | Estimates | CI | p | Estimates | CI | p |
(Intercept) | 3.04 | [2.97, 3.12] | <.001 | [2.97, 3.12] | <.001 | 6.39 | [6.25, 6.54] | <.001 | 6.39 | [6.25, 6.54] | <.001 | |
Subjective inequality | 0.30 | [0.22, 0.39] | <.001 | 0.30 | [0.22, 0.39] | <.001 | −0.24 | [−0.41, −0.07] | .006 | −0.24 | [−0.41, −0.07] | .006 |
Unfairness beliefs | 0.11 | [0.03, 0.19] | .010 | 0.11 | [0.03, 0.19] | .010 | 0.14 | [−0.03, 0.31] | .098 | 0.14 | [−0.03, 0.31] | .098 |
Subjective SES | −0.24 | [−0.32, −0.17] | <.001 | −0.24 | [−0.32, −0.17] | <.001 | 0.94 | [0.80, 1.09] | <.001 | 0.94 | [0.80, 1.09] | <.001 |
Age | −0.20 | [−0.28, −0.12] | <.001 | −0.20 | [−0.28, −0.12] | <.001 | 0.28 | [0.12, 0.44] | .001 | 0.28 | [0.12, 0.44] | .001 |
Conservatism | 0.06 | [−0.01, 0.14] | .101 | 0.06 | [−0.01, 0.14] | .101 | 0.07 | [−0.08, 0.22] | .363 | 0.07 | [−0.08, 0.22] | .363 |
Canada | 0.05 | [−0.11, 0.21] | .542 | −0.06 | [−0.38, 0.27] | .734 | ||||||
England | −0.09 | [−0.25, 0.07] | .249 | −0.09 | [−0.25, 0.07] | .249 | 0.51 | [0.19, 0.83] | .002 | 0.51 | [0.19, 0.83] | .002 |
Sweden | −0.05 | [−0.24, 0.13] | .588 | −0.05 | [−0.24, 0.13] | .588 | −0.31 | [−0.68, 0.06] | .097 | −0.31 | [−0.68, 0.06] | .097 |
Japan | 0.07 | [−0.09 t0.23] | .375 | 0.07 | [−0.09, 0.23 | .375 | −0.38 | [−0.70, −0.05] | .023 | −0.38 | [−0.70, −0.05] | .023 |
South Africa | 0.03 | [−0.14, 0.20] | .732 | 0.03 | [−0.14, 0.20] | .732 | −0.19 | [−0.53, 0.15] | .276 | −0.19 | [−0.53, 0.15] | .276 |
United States | −0.01 | [−0.18, 0.16] | .921 | 0.42 | [0.08, 0.77] | .015 | ||||||
Subjective Inequality × Canada | 0.09 | [−0.07, 0.26] | .273 | −0.29 | [−0.63, 0.05] | .090 | ||||||
Subjective Inequality × England | −0.01 | [−0.16, 0.15] | .947 | −0.01 | [−0.16, 0.15] | .947 | 0.34 | [0.03, 0.66] | .035 | 0.34 | [0.03, 0.66] | .035 |
Subjective Inequality × Sweden | −0.03 | [−0.22, 0.17] | .786 | −0.03 | [−0.22, 0.17] | .786 | 0.12 | [−0.26, 0.50] | .543 | 0.12 | [−0.26, 0.50] | .543 |
Subjective Inequality × Japan | 0.09 | [−0.06, 0.24] | .233 | 0.09 | [−0.06, 0.24] | .233 | 0.28 | [−0.02, 0.57] | .068 | 0.28 | [−0.02, 0.57] | .068 |
Subjective Inequality × South Africa | −0.19 | [−0.36, −0.02] | .030 | −0.19 | −0.36, −0.02] | .030 | 0.01 | [−0.33, 0.34] | .976 | 0.01 | [−0.33, 0.34] | .976 |
Subjective Inequality × United States | 0.03 | [−0.13, 0.19] | .679 | −0.45 | [−0.77, −0.13] | .006 | ||||||
Observations | 671 | 671 | 671 | 671 | ||||||||
R 2/adjusted R 2 | .250/.233 | .250/.233 | .305/.290 | .305/.290 |
Note. Conservatism: Higher scores indicate more conservative political orientation. Model 1: Effect codes for different countries with the United States as reference group; Model 2: effect codes for different countries with Canada as reference group; the intercept represents the unweighted grand mean, the betas for the different countries represent the mean difference in subjective well-being/status anxiety from the grand mean, and the interaction terms represent the difference in the slope for subjective inequality for each of the countries from the slope across all countries. Subjective inequality, unfairness beliefs, SES, age, and conservatism are standardized. p-values below .05 are bolded.