Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 24;21(1):1113–1140. doi: 10.1111/asap.12277

TABLE 1.

Interrater reliability results and subcategories of four main categories

Number Main category Kappa Interpretation Subcategories Frequencies
1 Who receives the most support? .90 Almost perfect agreement

  1. Older individuals

  2. Sensitive health conditions/disabilities

  3. Frontline workers

  4. Working class/marginalized communities

  •  5

  • 30

  • 28

  • 52
2 What type of support is provided? .96 Almost perfect agreement

  1. Material support

  2. Social/emotional support

  3. Psychological support

  • 78

  • 31

  • 20
3 Who supports? .96 Almost perfect agreement

  1. Organizations/associations/ companies (including faith communities)

  2. Advantaged
    1. Economically advantaged
    2. Physically advantaged

  3. Volunteers

  • 56

  • 23

  • 16

  • 75
4 Why do people support? .96 Almost perfect agreement

  1. Sharing an emergent identity with those affected

  2. Being an ally to disadvantaged groups

  3. Showing gratitude

33

91

 8

Note. Kappa < 0, poor agreement; 0.00–0.20, slight agreement; 0.21–0.40, fair agreement; 0.41–0.60, moderate agreement; 0.61–0.80, substantial agreement; 0.81–1.00, almost perfect agreement.