Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 20;15(1):5–26. doi: 10.1002/ase.2152

TABLE 3.

Comparison of assessment setting, structure, and material used before and during Covid‐19 (August–December, 2020)

Category Code Covid‐19 χ 2 P‐value
Before n (%) a During n (%) a
Setting Laboratory 158 (93) 70 (41) 33.9 <0.0001
Computer 6 (4) 95 (56) 78.4 <0.0001
None 6 (4) 6 (4) 0 1
Totals 170 (100) 171 (100) 0.002 0.957
Assessment Practicals 136 (61) 123 (54) 0.653 0.419
Oral assessments 17 (8) 14 (6) 0.29 0.59
Written assessments 18 (8) 42 (18) 9.6 0.002
Skill and/or dissection completion 10 (5) 8 (3) 0.222 0.637
Other assessments b 34 (15) 35 (15) 0.014 0.904
None 7 (3) 7 (3) 0 1
Totals 222 (100) 229 (100) 0.109 0.742
Material Cadaveric dissection/prosection 155 (61) 60 (26) 42 <0.0001
Bones, models, plastinates 41 (16) 15 (6) 12.1 0.001
Imaging c 36 (14) 127 (54) 50.8 <0.0001
Other d 16 (6) 23 (10) 1.26 0.262
Not applicable 4 (2) 4 (2) 0 1
None 4 (2) 5 (2) 0.111 0.739
Totals 256 (100) 234 (100) 0.988 0.32

Total number of respondents (n = 186); McNemar's test, P < 0.05.

a

Data that were coded as unclear, undetermined, or unreported were not included in the analysis (n = 235).

b

Examples include assignments, integrated assessments, quizzes.

c

Examples of images include medical imaging, photographs of cadaveric material, textbook images.

d

Examples include 3D virtual models, video, and virtual reality.