Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 8.
Published in final edited form as: AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Jun 10;10(3):190–200. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1618417

Table 2.

Communication with research doctor and perception of being informed

Informed/fully informed
Mean (SD)
Not at all to unsure
Mean (SD)
t statistics,
p value
Cohen’s d (effect size)
Communication Total Score
How well informed when enrolled in treatment clinical trials 4.45 (0.52)
n=95
4.06 (0.70)
n=11
2.26,
p=0.026
0.63
How well informed at this point of participation 4.45 (0.53)
n=96
4.03 (0.62)
n=10
2.36,
p=0.020
0.73
How well informed about changes in study 4.48 (0.53)
n=82
4.15 (0.57)
n=23
2.55,
p=0.012
0.60
Communication Information exchange
How well informed when enrolled in treatment clinical trials 4.38 (0.58)
n=95
3.86 (0.79)
n=11
2.73,
p=0.007
0.75
How well informed at this point of participation 4.38 (0.58)
n=96
3.77 (0.71)
n=10
3.14,
p=0.002
0.94
How well informed about changes in study 4.42 (0.58)
n=82
3.98 (0.65)
n=23
3.13,
p=0.002
0.71
Relational Communication
How well informed when enrolled in treatment clinical trials 4.55 (0.53)
n=95
4.36 (0.66)
n=11
−1.09,
p=0.277
0.32
How well informed at this point of participation 4.55 (0.55)
n=96
4.42 (0.58)
n=10
−0.71,
p=0.478
0.23
How well informed about changes in study 4.56 (0.54)
n=82
4.41 (0.56)
n=23
−1.16,
p=0.249
0.27

Note: Cohen’s d effect size: small=0.2, moderate=0.5, large=0.8