Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Urol Oncol. 2021 Mar 4;39(11):781.e17–781.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.027

Table 2:

Summary of consensus statements

Role and rationale of focal therapy
 - There is a role for focal therapy in select men discontinuing active surveillance.
 - Compared to radical whole gland treatment, Focal therapy:
  1. Is less invasive
  2. Has greater likelihood to preserve erectile function
  3. Has greater likelihood to preserve urinary continence
  4. Is associated with earlier recovery post-treatment

Patient demographics and disease factors
 - For age 60 – 80, should consider focal therapy when coming off active surveillance.
 - Gleason 3+4 cancer (grade group 2) with localized disease
 - Men with PSA <10 ng/mL are ideally suited for focal therapy
 - Patients with multi-focal grade group 2 or higher lesions are not ideal candidates for focal therapy.

Work up
 - An increasing PSA or a biomarker test indicating higher risk of adverse pathology should not prompt focal therapy, but instead prompt re-interrogation of the prostate.
 - mpMRI/US guided fusion biopsy and a 12-core systematic biopsy is recommended for men on active surveillance prior to considering focal therapy.
 - If unable to undergo mpMRI, patients will require a 3D mapping biopsy of the prostate to determine if they are a candidate for focal therapy
 - No metastatic workup is usually required prior to considering focal therapy

Ablation template
 - There was no consensus on the ideal template for focal therapy.

PSA: Prostate-specific antigen; mpMRI: multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging