Table 2:
Summary of consensus statements
| Role and rationale of focal therapy |
| - There is a role for focal therapy in select men discontinuing active surveillance. |
| - Compared to radical whole gland treatment, Focal therapy: |
| 1. Is less invasive |
| 2. Has greater likelihood to preserve erectile function |
| 3. Has greater likelihood to preserve urinary continence |
| 4. Is associated with earlier recovery post-treatment |
|
|
| Patient demographics and disease factors |
| - For age 60 – 80, should consider focal therapy when coming off active surveillance. |
| - Gleason 3+4 cancer (grade group 2) with localized disease |
| - Men with PSA <10 ng/mL are ideally suited for focal therapy |
| - Patients with multi-focal grade group 2 or higher lesions are not ideal candidates for focal therapy. |
|
|
| Work up |
| - An increasing PSA or a biomarker test indicating higher risk of adverse pathology should not prompt focal therapy, but instead prompt re-interrogation of the prostate. |
| - mpMRI/US guided fusion biopsy and a 12-core systematic biopsy is recommended for men on active surveillance prior to considering focal therapy. |
| - If unable to undergo mpMRI, patients will require a 3D mapping biopsy of the prostate to determine if they are a candidate for focal therapy |
| - No metastatic workup is usually required prior to considering focal therapy |
|
|
| Ablation template |
| - There was no consensus on the ideal template for focal therapy. |
PSA: Prostate-specific antigen; mpMRI: multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging