Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Stat Assoc. 2020 Apr 20;116(535):1521–1532. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1745813

Table 2:

Results from simulation study with p = 25 and sparse Ω0 in the three scenarios: factor, linear and independent for n = 500. We computed test error, Frobenious norm, MSE for main effects, percentage of true positives and true negatives for main effects and interactions for Hiernet, Family, PIE, RAMP and FIN model with a = 0.5 across 50 simulations. Test error, FR, and main MSE are presented as ratios compared to the best performing model.

HierNet FAMILY PIE RAMP FIN
test error 1.284 5.274 1.206 4.225 1
FR 1.189 1.259 1 2.157 1.284
factor main MSE 3.430 1.560 1 1.590 1.312
TP main 0.667 0.823 0.698 0.583 0.812
TN main 0.445 0.259 0.863 0.834 0.716
TP int 0.514 0.839 0.562 0.031 0.448
TN int 0.959 0.580 0.974 0.965 0.941
test error 1.199 5.271 1 5.060 1.486
FR 3.889 6.859 1 7.916 5.370
linear main MSE 1 3.563 1.387 1.392 1.726
TP main 1 0.845 0.857 0.952 0.976
TN main 0.484 0.272 0.845 0.815 0.807
TP int 0.970 0.887 0.964 0.077 0.917
TN int 0.970 0.645 0.987 0.975 0.894
test error 1.425 9.685 1 12.746 3.438
FR 12.956 18.036 1 21.604 9.607
independent main MSE 1 6.082 3.056 4.326 3.055
TP main 1 0.830 0.860 0.630 0.900
TN main 0.418 0.585 0.847 0.915 0.898
TP int 1 0.852 1 0.071 0.921
TN int 0.993 0.868 0.990 0.995 0.957