Table 4.
Results of the elemental analysis (in ng m−3) of PM1 and PM10 samples between 14 March and 18 May over the period 2015–2020.a.
| PM1 |
PM10 |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |
| K | 59 | 67 | 56 | 53 | 38 | 23 | 146 | 125 | 180 | 162 | 148 | 89 |
| Ca | 262 | 355 | 161 | 177 | 171 | 42 | 1212 | 1006 | 1259 | 1169 | 1062 | 403 |
| Tib | ─ | ─ | ─ | ─ | ─ | ─ | 13 | 9 | 13 | 14 | 12 | 9 |
| Mn | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 8 |
| Fe | 87 | 98 | 70 | 70 | 73 | 47 | 335 | 259 | 371 | 345 | 335 | 156 |
| Ni | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 4 |
| Cu | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 16 | 13 | 18 | 16 | 16 | 7 |
| Zn | 12 | 15 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 21 | 22 | 21 | 23 | 19 | 13 |
Concentrations below detection limit were replaced by detection limit.
The percentage of data above the detection limit for PM1 was lower than 70 %.