Table 2.

Quality appraisal tool.

Relevance to the review question.	1. Does the full-text paper describe early intervention mental health services for LGBTQ+ ​young people empirically or conceptually?
	2. Does the full-text paper describe self-care support services for LGBTQ+ ​young people empirically or theoretically?
Quality standard in relation to the discipline of origin.	3. Does the full-text paper appropriately describe the research setting including the aim and objectives?
	4. Does the full-text paper fully detail the empirical research in a rigorous way (i.e., description of methodology, methods, data collection, analysis and ethics)?
	5. Are the interpretations and conclusions robust?