Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 1;240(1):66–83. doi: 10.1111/joa.13529

TABLE 3.

Effect of life stage, breeding conditions, and genetic line on shape and topographic parameters. Two comparisons are presented: Balan W/Balan L (life stage estimated by the cubic root of weight) and Balan L/Swiss (life stage directly provided by age). The models include life stage, group and interaction (W:G or Age:G) on shape (estimated by scores on PC1) and topographic parameters. p‐values of linear models are provided for the analysis of the upper molar row (UMR) and the first upper molar (UM1). In bold: p < 0.001; underlined: p < 0.01; in italics: p < 0.05

Groups UMR UM1
Weight1/3 Group W:G Weight1/3 Group W:G
Balan W vs. Balan L Shape (PC1) 0.0243 2.190e−06 4.292e−05 0.0006 0.0003 0.0024
Balan W vs. Balan L DNE 0.2713 0.5704 0.2989 0.2270 0.0387 0.0231
Balan W vs. Balan L RFI 0.0087 0.1592 0.0292 0.0204 0.0008 0.0011
Balan W vs. Balan L OPCR 0.0056 0.3311 0.5738 0.0197 0.5625 0.4440
Balan W vs. Balan L Slope 0.0323 0.5365 0.3175 0.0396 0.0002 0.0005
Age Group Age:G Age Group Age:G
Balan L vs. Swiss Shape (PC1) 0.0050 0.1000 0.0939 0.0003 0.3855 0.1736
Balan L vs. Swiss DNE 0.0679 0.1696 0.9086 0.2324 0.0035 0.8476
Balan L vs. Swiss RFI 0.0029 0.4894 0.8524 0.0314 0.0059 0.4509
Balan L vs. Swiss OPCR 0.6832 0.0089 0.4003 0.0761 0.0016 0.2266
Balan L vs. Swiss Slope 0.0678 0.0911 0.3339 0.1794 0.0074 0.2413