Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Aug 12;180:109004. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109004

Table 3:

Distribution of the measured eGDR at Y20 and Y25 exams among the three categories of the difference between 2hPG and FPG at Y10.

Low Post Load
N=754 (40%)
Medium Post Load
N=659 (35%)
High Post Load
N=466 (25%)
eGDR at Y20 Mean (95%CI); p value+ Mean (95%CI); p value+ Mean (95%CI)
Minimally adjusted model* 9.5 (9.4, 9.7) 9.3 (9.2, 9.5); p=0.15 8.7 (8.4, 8.9); p=<.0001
Fully adjusted model** 9.5 (9.0, 10.1) 9.6 (9.1, 10.2); p=0.22 9.4 (8.8, 9.9); p=0.13
eGDR at Y25
Minimally adjusted model* 8.8 (8.6, 9.0) 8.5 (8.3, 8.7); p=0.03 7.9 (7.6, 8.1); p=<.0001
Fully adjusted model** 8.2 (7.5, 8.9) 8.1 (7.4, 8.8); p=0.77 7.9 (7.2, 8.6); p=0.07
*

Age, Sex, Race and Field Center

**

Age, Sex, Race, Field Center, Years of Education, Marital Status, BMI, Smoking, Physical Activity, Lipids, Systolic & Diastolic Blood Pressure, HOMA-IR, Medications use and C - reactive protein

+

p value for the difference between eGDR in High/Medium Post Load categories and Low Post Load category (reference).