Table 3.
Narrative synthesis reported sensitivity and specificity by each included study.
| Study | Patient level | Vessel Level | Segment Level | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sens (%) (95% CI) | Spec (%) (95% CI) | Sens (%) (95% CI) | Spec (%) (95% CI) | Sens (%) (95% CI) | Spec (%) (95% CI) | |
| Andreini 2018 4 | 100* | 81.8 (65.7–97.9)* | N/A | N/A | 95.2 (93.6–96.9) | 98.9 (98.1–99.7) |
| Gang 2012 21 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 94.6 (85.13–98.88) | 97 (94.38–98.62) |
| Li 2013 17 | 97 (84.7–99.5) | 89.3 (72.8, 96.3) | 91.1(79.3–96.5) | 96.5(93.0–98.3) | 95.5 (90.9–97.8) | 98.0 (96.7–98.8) |
| Liang 2019 14 | 100 ‡ | 85.7 ‡ | 96.6 ‡ | 96.6 ‡ | 92.2 ‡ | 97.8 ‡ |
| Neefjes 2013 18 | 100 (93.0–100 95) | 63 (35–85) | 99 (96–100) | 84 (78–89) | 93 (88–98) | 93 (91–95) |
| Nerlekar 2017 15 | 100 (90–100) | 88 (64–99) | 98 (91–100) | 94 (89–97) | 84 (76–90) | 96 (94–97) |
| Selçuk 2016 19 | 87.8 ‡ | 88 ‡ | 81.4 ‡ | 95 ‡ | 87.8 ‡ | 99.2 ‡ |
| Sun 2013 16 | 100 (88.0–100) | 63.6 (31.6–87.6 ) | 90.0 (81.4–95.0) | 95.2 (91.9– 97.2) | 92.6 (86.1–96.4) | 97.0 (95.1–98.2) |
| Wang 2016 22 | ||||||
| (HR 70–90 bpm) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 96.00 ‡ | 93.70 ‡ |
| (HR>90 bpm) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 97.60 ‡ | 92.20 ‡ |
| Zhang 2016 20 | 100 (73.2–100) | 100 (19.8–100) | 96.4 (80.0–99.8) | 91.7 (76.4–97.8) | 88.6 (74.6–95.7) | 90.8 (84.8–94.7) |
\x90*
Result based on evaluable segments only (non‐diagnostic segments excluded).
‡
95% confidence interval not reported.