Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 9.
Published in final edited form as: Early Hum Dev. 2018 May 3;121:21–26. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.04.018

Table 4.

Linear Regression Results for the Relationship between Level of Mutual Dyadic Responsiveness and Composite Scores on the Bayley-III Scales of Infant Development, adjusting for covariates, H-HOPE Study

Bayley-III Scales of Infant Development
Motor Scale
(R2 = 0.14, n = 134)
Language Scale
(R2 = 0.08, n = 137)
Cognitive Scale
(R2 = 0.16, n = 136)
Beta SE p Beta SE p Beta SE p
Intercept 121.2 2.73 -- 106.6 1.26 -- 114.1 2.89 --
High vs Low Responsiveness 2.80 1.64 0.09 4.94 1.58 0.002 2.34 1.63 0.15
Moderate vs Low Responsiveness 1.73 1.63 0.29 2.51 1.58 0.11 −0.73 1.62 0.65
H-HOPE intervention 1.53 1.33 0.25 −2.61 1.28 0.04 0.82 1.32 0.53
Latina vs African-American −3.92 1.33 0.004
POPRAS score −0.08 0.03 0.02
English vs Spanish 3.60 1.53 0.02
Mother Lives with Her Mother/Other Adult vs with Infant’s Father −4.18 1.63 0.01
Mother Lives Alone vs with Infant’s Father −7.63 2.02 0.0002
Multiple birth vs Singleton −5.53 2.19 0.01