Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 25;12:722238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722238

TABLE 4.

Reporting tests for measurement invariance.

Model χ2 (df) CFI TLI RMSEA (90% CI) SRMR Model comparison Δχ2 (df) Δ CFI Δ TLI Δ RMSEA Decision
Gendera
M1: Configural invariance 128.37** (69) 0.948 0.932 0.064 (0.047–0.082) 0.079
M2: Metric invariance 144.77** (76) 0.939 0.928 0.066 (0.050–0.082) 0.110 M1 16.40* (7) 0.009 0.004 0.002 Accept
M3: Scalar invariance 178.73** (86) 0.918 0.915 0.072 (0.057–0.087) 0.110 M2 33.96** (10) 0.021 0.014 0.006 Reject
M3a: Partial scalar invariance 160.62** (83) 0.932 0.926 0.067 (0.051–0.083) 0.108 M2 15.86* (7) 0.007 0.002 0.001 Accept
Timeb
M1: Configural invariance 92.25* (68) 0.980 0.973 0.041 (0.015–0.061) 0.0637
M2: Metric invariance 98.94* (76) 0.981 0.977 0.038 (0.009–0.057) 0.0622 M1 6.69 (8) −0.001 −0.004 0.003 Accept
M3: Scalar invariance 104.06 (86) 0.985 0.984 0.031 (0.000–0.051) 0.0623 M2 5.13 (10) −0.004 −0.007 0.007 Accept

aNtime1 = 209

bNtime2 = 107.

*p < 0.05

**p < 0.001.