Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 25;18(23):12386. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312386

Table 2.

The main features used in proposed classification systems for adenomyosis.

Reference Categories/Basis of Classification
Histopathology
Bird et al. (1972)
Sammour et al. (2002)
Depth of invasion within the mometrium
Degree of involvement:
Number of glands per low power field
Siegler and Camilien (1994)
Hulka et al. (2002)
Vercellini et al. (2006)
Depth of penetration
Degree of involvement
Configuration: Diffuse, discrete.
Levgur et al. (2000) Depth of invasion
Ultrasound based
Lazzeri et al. (2018) Configuration
Depth of lesion (affecting Junctional zone, inner, outer myometrium)
MRI based
Grodts et al. (2008) JZ hyperplasia
Adenomyosis
Adenomyoma
Kishi et al. (2012) Subtype I: Intrinsic: Inner uterine layer
Subtype II: Extrinsic: Outer uterine layer (normal JZ)
Subtype III: Solitary adenomyosis no connection to the JZ or to the serosa.
Subtype IV: Indeterminate
Kobayashi and Matsubara (2020) Depth of lesion
Configuration
Size of lesion
Localization of lesion
Concomitant pathology
Bazot and Daraï (2018) A Internal adenomyosis
Configuration
B Adenomyomas
Consistency
C External adenomyosis
Location
Coexisting endometriosis
Grimbizis et al. (2014) Configuration
Polypoid forms
Special (rare forms)
Features at surgery
Pistofidis et al. (2014) Consistency
Imaging based
Gordt et al. (2018) Extent
Localization
Configuration
Consistency
Size