Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 25;13(23):5940. doi: 10.3390/cancers13235940

Table 2.

Summary of relative risks by sub-group analyses on indoor tanning and melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC).

Ever Use of Indoor Tanning Device Study
N
Summary
RR (95% CI)
Heterogeneity
I2 (%) P-Cochran
Non-melanoma skin cancer
Histology
Squamous cell carcinoma 9 1.58 (1.38–1.81) 27 0.21
Basal cell carcinoma 10 1.24 (1.00–1.55) 61 <0.01
Anatomic site
Not defined in each paper 18 1.40 (1.18–1.65) 77 <0.01
Type of indoor tanning
NMSC, overall 1
Sunlamp 4 1.22 (0.75–1.97) 58 0.07
Sunbed 7 1.43 (1.10–1.85) 82 <0.01
SCC
Sunlamp 2 1.72 (1.16–2.53) 0 0.47
Sunbed 5 1.48 (1.20–1.83) 61 0.04
BCC
Sunlamp 2 1.21 (0.75–1.95) 0 0.95
Sunbed 2 4.41 (1.10–77.08) 83 0.02
Study design
Cohort 2 5 1.48 (1.18–1.84) 83 <0.01
Case-control study (NMSC, overall) 13 1.29 (0.97–1.72) 70 <0.01
(SCC) 5 1.76 (1.22–2.52) 51 0.09
(BCC) 9 1.17 (0.84–1.64) 65 <0.01
Publication year
<2000 3 3 1.57 (0.75–3.27) 50 0.13
≥2000 (NMSC, overall) 15 1.39 (1.17–1.66) 79 <0.01
(SCC) 7 1.55 (1.25–1.92) 73 <0.01
(BCC) 8 1.19 (0.90–1.56) 74 <0.01
Cutaneous melanoma
Histology
Superficial spreading melanoma (SSM) 2 1.21 (0.81–1.82) 75 0.05
Nodular melanoma (NM) 2 1.03 (0.51–2.11) 66 0.09
Lentigo maligna melanoma (LM) 1 2.83 (1.37–5.84) - -
Others 1 1.27 (0.63–2.58) - -
Anatomic site
Trunk 6 1.62 (1.25–2.10) 57 0.04
Head and neck 5 1.16 (0.64–2.13) 68 0.01
Limbs 5 1.38 (1.07–1.77) 55 0.07
Type of indoor tanning
Sunlamp 9 1.31 (1.04–1.64) 52 0.03
Sunbed 19 1.17 (1.05–1.31) 56 <0.01
Study design
Cohort 5 1.20 (1.11–1.29) 7 0.37
Case-control study 31 1.30 (1.14–1.47) 65 <0.01
Publication year
<2000 15 1.28 (1.09–1.50) 35 0.09
≥2000 21 1.26 (1.12–1.42) 72 <0.01

Abbreviation: P-Cochran, p-value in Cochran Q test; SCC, Squamous cell carcinoma; BCC, Basal cell carcinoma; NMSC, Non-melanoma skin cancer. 1 Three studies had the results of both SCC and BCC risks (Zhang et al. (2012); Bajdik et al. (1996); Han et al. (2006)). We calculated summary RRs for SCC risk and BCC risk, and the calculated summary RRs were included in the meta-analysis. 2 Four of five cohort studies were focused on SCC risk. 3 Two of three cohort studies were focused on SCC risk and two of three studies were focused on BCC risk.