Table 4.

Hierarchical regression analysis for teen anxiety (n = 2590).

Model	Variable	b	SE	β	R 2	Adjusted R 2	F
1					0.082	0.078	4.44 ***
	Gender	0.432	0.342	0.056
	Age	0.082	0.292	0.013
	Race (Black)	−0.803	0.468	−0.101
	Race (Hispanic)	−0.732	0.452	−0.092
	Race (Other)	−0.820	0.607	−0.045
	Race (Multi-racial)	0.693	0.914	0.039
	Grade Level	0.010	0.216	0.002
	Academic Performance	−0.283	0.348	−0.032
	Special Education Services	2.29	0.491	0.225 ***
	Below Poverty (100–199%)	−0.360	0.488	−0.041
	Out of/Above Poverty (200% or above)	−1.091	0.380	−0.145 **
2					0.159	0.155	5.91 ***
	Gender	0.167	0.315	0.022
	Age	0.153	0.274	0.024
	Race (Black)	−0.939	0.465	−0.118 *
	Race (Hispanic)	−0.717	0.458	−0.090
	Race (Other)	−0.948	0.550	−0.052
	Race (Multi-racial)	0.488	0.834	0.027
	Grade Level	−0.019	0.225	−0.004
	Academic Performance	−0.046	0.363	−0.005
	Special Education Services	2.39	0.496	0.235 ***
	Below Poverty (100–199%)	−0.501	0.453	−0.057
	Out of/Above Poverty (200% or above)	−0.670	0.396	−0.089
	Parent Connectedness	−0.434	0.113	−0.157 ***
	School Connectedness	−0.297	0.089	−0.166 ***
	Neighborhood Connectedness	−0.123	0.072	−0.082

Note. For gender, 0 = male, 1 = female; for academic performance, 0 = low, 1 = high; for special education services, 0 = no, 1 = yes. Well below poverty (i.e., 99% or below) was the reference group for family poverty level and White was the reference group for race. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.