Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 5;13(23):6128. doi: 10.3390/cancers13236128

Table 2.

Important studies evaluating the role of surgery in ependymoma patients. IT: infratentorial; ST: supratentorial. GTR: gross total resection; STR: subtotal resection; y = years; NA = not available.

Study N. Location Grading EOR OS PFS
Varma, 2018 [50] 13 IT 61.5%
ST 38.5%
I GTR 92% STR 8% NA NA
Song, 2017 [15] 53 IT 64.2%
ST 35.8%
II 66%
III 34%
GTR 54.7% STR 45.3% 5 y 82.5%,
10 y 75.7%
NA
Dutzmann 2013 [5] 64 IT 35.6%
ST 34.4%,
I 28.1%
II 51.6%
III 20.3%
GTR 76.6% NA NA
Metellus, 2010 [47] 114 IT 80.7%
ST 19.3%
II GTR 58.7%, STR 41.3% 5 y 86%
10 y 81%
5 y 74.6%
10 y 58.9%
Vitanovics, 2009 [51] 61 IT 51%
ST 49%
II 65.5%
III 34.5%
GTR 60% STR 40% NA NA
Figarella-Branger, 2007 [13] 216 IT 66%
ST 34%
II 73%
III 27%
NA NA NA
Metellus, 2007 [12] 152 IT 70%
ST 30%
II 72%
III 28.3%
GTR 58.6% STR 41.4%, 5 y 84.8%
10 y 76.5%
5 y 63.5%
10 y 52.8%
Metellus, 2007 [49] 121 IT 66%
ST 34%
II 72.7%
III 27.3%
GTR 63% STR 37% 5 y 85%
10 y 76%
NA
Reni, 2003 [52] 70 IT 44%
ST 56%
II 77%
III 23%
GTR grade II 63%
GTR grade III 47%
5 y 67%
10 y 50%
NA
Donahue, 1998 [53] 10 IT 80%
ST 20%
not specified GTR 10% STR 90% NA NA