COMMENT
This paper focuses on the establishment and immediate impact of the national program for protection of residents of long‐term care facilities (LTCF). More than a year and half into the pandemic, this approach is still having positive impact. Wide PCR testing and vaccination were integrated into the program as they became available.
BACKGROUND
Early in the COVID‐19 pandemic, it was clear that residents in LTCF were at elevated risk for infection and severe disease. 1 Outbreaks in LTCF in various countries 2 , 3 highlighted the need for an organized response. 4 , 5 , 6 In Israel, the first COVID‐19 outbreak in an LTCF occurred on March 15, 2020, followed by a rapid increase of cases (see Figure 1). During this period, the cumulative mortality rate in LTCF increased from 0.1 deaths per 10,000 residents on March 20 to 4.5 on April 11. By April 13, about 30% of the total COVID‐19 deaths in the country occurred in LTCF. 7
FIGURE 1.
Number of new Coronavirus cases reported daily per 10,000 persons in long‐term care facilities (LTCF) in Israel
There are (as of April 2020) 88,904 residents living in 1315 Israeli LTCF, 3.5% of the elderly population, for which four different government ministries are responsible. 8 This structure presented a challenge for decision makers to set consistent guidelines for best practice.
METHODS
On April 11, 2020, the government established the “Fathers and Mothers Shield” (FMS), a national project to reduce morbidity and mortality from COVID‐19 in all the LTCF in Israel while enabling, to some extent, a return to daily life routines.
FMS had three objectives: (1) Publication of COVID‐19 policy guidelines; (2) improving the speed, quality, and quantity of PCR testing; and (3) interruption of potential infection chains.
Guidelines and transparency
Given the urgency and despite the multiplicity of governmental agencies, within a week the program was crafted, including detailed guidelines for outbreak control, staff training, and classification of functional and medical conditions of verified and suspected cases. A daily summary of updated guidelines and epidemiologic data was published online to increase transparency. To strengthen communication, the FMS held weekly videoconferences with LTCF CEO's of the four ministries, residents, and family members. This followed on‐site visits. The meetings enabled surge planning and ongoing guideline updates while promoting compliance and sustainability.
The military and NGOs educated the LTCF staff on infection control, personal protective equipment (PPE), and FMS guidelines. Two dedicated national hotlines served institutions and families.
Visitation
The decision to allow visits was noteworthy, because in many countries, LTCF residents were in complete isolation, placing them at risk for mental distress, functional and cognitive decline. 9 , 10 FMS pioneered visitations according to specific guidelines to ensure safe family visits. This resulted in immediate amelioration of residents' emotional and mental health.
PCR testing and interruption of potential infection chains
A dynamic outbreak risk‐assessment index of LTCF included previous outbreaks in the institution, case mix, geographic COVID‐19 rate. One‐third of national testing resources were shifted to the FMS project enabling prioritized screening of residents and staff, regardless of their health maintenance organization (HMO). Magen David Adom (Israel's national emergency and prehospital medical organization) provided on‐site testing with an improved centralized registry and a fast‐tracking result system. LTCF implemented daily surveillance of vital signs and symptom assessment, providing early detection and immediate infection chain interruption. COVID‐19 positive residents transferred to hospital outbreak departments.
The national program dealt with a variety of subpopulations, among them holocaust survivors, ultra‐orthodox population, and new immigrants all of whom require specific cultural sensitivity.
A logistics plan identified addressed shortages in human resources and PPE.
RESULTS
Guidelines
Determining a unified policy, issuing centralized guidelines, and transparency improved compliance with guidelines throughout the country despite the many ethnic and religious groups in Israel and reduced outbreaks.
PCR testing and interruption of potential infection chains
A short 2 weeks after FMS was established, the sample rate per 10,000 persons increased from 57.5 to 311.6 (542% increase), compared with 13.3 in the general population.
REDUCING MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY
The measures to reduce COVID‐19 morbidity and mortality rates worked (Figure 1). Two weeks into the program, the mortality rate per week in LTCF decreased from 3.82 per 10,000 persons to 1.91, and 0.9 in the following weeks.
CONCLUSIONS
Israel's pioneering national plan to deal with the outbreak of the Coronavirus in LTCF provided effective management of the pandemic while enabling, to some extent, the return of daily life routines. These findings provide important insights for future response to emergencies in LTCF.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
All authors meet the criteria for authorship as stated in the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals. Study concept and design: Hanni S. Schroeder, Omri Goldwyn, and Ronni Gamzu. Acquisition of data: Hanni S. Schroeder, Omri Goldwyn, and Ronni Gamzu. Analysis and interpretation of data: Hanni S. Schroeder, Omri Goldwyn, and Ronni Gamzu. Drafting of the manuscript: Hanni S. Schroeder and Omri Goldwyn. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Hanni S. Schroeder, Omri Goldwyn, and Ronni Gamzu.
SPONSOR'S ROLE
None.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Professor Mark A. Clarfield, from Ben‐Gurion University of the Negev, Israel, Professor Bruce Rosen, from the Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel and Ms Barbara Sofer from Hadassah Woman's Zionist Organization of America, for their professional input and helpful discussions that greatly contributed to the paper.
Schroeder HS, Goldwyn O, Gamzu R. A pioneering national program for the protection of residents of long‐term care facilities during the COVID‐19 pandemic. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022;70(2):370-372. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17524
REFERENCES
- 1. Abrams HR, Loomer L, Gandhi A, Grabowski DC. Characteristics of U.S. nursing homes with COVID‐19 cases. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(8):1653‐1656. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Fisman DN, Bogoch I, Lapointe‐Shaw L, McCready J, Tuite AR. Risk factors associated with mortality among residents with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) in long‐term care facilities in Ontario, Canada. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(7):e2015957. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Graham NSN, Junghans C, Downes R, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, clinical features and outcome of COVID‐19 in United Kingdom nursing homes. J Infect. 2020;81(3):411‐419. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Fritch WM, Agnew J, Rosman L, Cadorette MA, Barnett DJ. Application of the Haddon matrix to COVID‐19 prevention and containment in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. Published online July 8, 2021. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kim G, Wang M, Pan H, Davidson GH, Roxby AC, et al. A health system response to COVID‐19 in long‐term care and post‐acute care: a three‐phase approach. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(6):1155‐1161. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Aïdoud A, Poupin P, Gana W, et al. Helping nursing homes to manage the COVID‐19 crisis: an illustrative example from France. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(11):2475‐2477. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Tsadok‐Rosenbluth S, Leibner G, Hovav B, Horowitz G & Brammli‐Greenberg S The impact of COVID‐19 on people using and providing Long‐Term Care in Israel. Report available at LTCcovid.org, International Long‐Term Care Policy Network, CPEC‐LSE; April 29, 2020.
- 8. Dwolatzky T, Brodsky J, Azaiza F, Clarfield AM, Jacobs JM, Litwin H. Coming of age: health‐care challenges of an ageing population in Israel. Lancet. 2017;389(10088):2542‐2550. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30789-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lynn J. Playing the cards we are dealt: Covid‐19 and nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(8):1629‐1630. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Cocuzzo B, Wrench A, O'Malley C. Balancing protection from COVID‐19 and the need for human touch in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(12):2749‐2751. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]