Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 28;18(23):12551. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312551

Table 2.

Mediating effects tests.

Coefficient Bootstrap 90% CI
Direct effects Percentile BC f 2
H1: Leadership—Burnout −0.05 [−0.11, 0.02] [−0.12, 0.02] 0.00
H2: Leadership—Climate 0.51 sig [0.46, 0.56] [0.46, 0.56] 0.35
H4: Leadership—Dehumanization −0.39 sig [−0.45, −0.33] [−0.45, −0.34] 0.18
H3: Climate—Burnout −0.24 sig [−0.30, −0.17] [−0.31, −0.17] 0.06
H5: Dehumanization—Burnout 0.41 sig [0.35, 0.47] [0.35, 0.47] 0.20
Indirect effects Point estimate Percentile BC VAF
H2 × H3 −0.12 sig [−0.16, −0.09] [−0.16, −0.09] 36.5%
H4 × H5 −0.16 sig [−0.20, −0.13] [−0.20, −0.13] 48.4%
Total indirect effects −0.28 sig [−0.33, −0.24] [−0.33, −0.24] 84.9%

Note. sig: significant, CI: Confidence interval, BC: bias corrected, VAF: variance accounted for, f2: effect size.