Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 23;13(23):5878. doi: 10.3390/cancers13235878

Table 1.

Description of the prospective and retrospective cohorts used in the study. Retrospective cohort related to Figure 1; Prospective cohort related to Figures 2–4.

Retrospective Cohort Prospective Cohort
Total number of
patients
215 26
Gender Female 215 25 (96%)
Male 0 1 (4%)
Date of Inclusion 2004–2012 2013–2020
Mean follow-up (years) 7.7 1.5
Mean age at diagnosis (years) 55
(22 min–87 max)
53
(29 min–76 max)
I 41 (19%) 3 (11%)
Histological grade II III 67 (31%)
105 (49%)
9 (35%)
13 (50%)
NA 2 (1%) 1 (4%)
pT0 0 3 (11%)
pT1 146 (68%) 10 (39%)
Pathological tumor pT2 62 (29%) 11 (42%)
size (pT) pT3 4 (1.5%) 1 (4%)
pT4 3 (1.5%) 0
NA 0 1 (4%)
Pathological Lymph node status (pN) Negative Positive NA 127 (59%)
86 (40%)
2 (1%)
21 (81%)
4 (15%)
1 (4%)
Metastatic status Negative Positive NA 203 (94%)
3 (2%)
9 (4%)
25 (96%)
0
1 (4%)
Mean tumor size (mm) 19 23.7
Lum A 96 (45%) 9 (35%)
Breast cancer subtype Lum B
HER2
-
54 (25%)
3 (11.5%)
3 (11.5%)
TN 65 (30%) 11 (42%)
CAF-S1 32 (15%) -
CAF-S2 38 (18%) -
CAF enrichment CAF-S3 3 (1%) -
CAF-S4 111 (52%) -
NA 31 (14%) -
CAF-S1 CAF-S2 CAF-S3 CAF-S4 NA
CAF enrichment in breast cancer subtypes LumA HER2 6
(6%)
34
(35%)
1
(1%)
40
(42%)
15
(16%)
-
-
9
(17%)
2
(3%)
1
(2%)
33
(61%)
9
(17%)
TN 16 2 1 38 8 -
(25%) (3%) (1%) (59%) (12%)
Yes 85 (39%) 11 (42%)
Hormonotherapy No 126 (59%) 0
NA 4 (2%) 15 (58%)
Yes 204 (95%) 21 (81%)
Radiotherapy No 0 4 (15%)
NA 11 (5%) 1 (4%)
Yes 141 (66%) 19 (73%)
Chemotherapy No 0 0
NA 74 (34%) 7 (27%)
Yes 45 (21%) 2 (8%)
Targeted therapy No 0 0
NA 170 (79%) 24 (92%)

List of abbreviations: pT: Pathological tumor size; pN: Pathological Lymph node status: mm: millimeters; Breast cancer subtypes: Lum A/B: Luminal A/B; HER2: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; TN: Triple Negative; NA: Not available.