Table 2.
Rh,90/nm | Angular Dependency (Peak 2 or 3) | Peak 2 or 3 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient | Sample | Peak 1 | Peak 2 | Peak 3 | Rh,0/nm | Rg/nm | ρ | % Itot,90 (Peak 2 or 3) |
OC1 # | plasma | 3.7 | 24 | 70 | ||||
ascites | 7.0 | 27 | 80 | |||||
ascitesF | / | 29 | / | |||||
OC2 | plasma | 5.4 | 24 | / | 24.3 | 24.8 | 1.02 | 88 |
ascites | 4.2 | 21 | / | 22.9 | 23.7 | 1.04 | 77 | |
ascitesF | 4.0 | 20 | / | 20.2 | 20.4 | 1.01 | 76 | |
OC3 | plasma | 4.4 | 17 | 46 & | 25.4 | 26.2 | 1.03 | 63 |
ascites | 7.2 | 17 | / | 20.6 | 21.1 | 1.03 | 61 | |
ascitesF | 4.6 | 20 | / | 21.9 | 25.5 | 1.16 | 77 | |
OC4 | plasma | 2.7 | 22 | / | 24.7 | 25.5 | 1.03 | 64 |
ascites | 2.9 | 17 | 102 & | 21.9 | 21.2 | 0.97 | 51 | |
ascitesF | 4.1 | 24 | / | 21.2 | 21.8 | 1.03 | 56 | |
OC5 | plasma | 4.7 | 23 | / | 34.0 | 34.0 | 1.00 | 50 |
ascites | 3.7 | 20 | / | 34.2 | 36.3 | 1.06 | 46 | |
ascitesF | 4.1 | 24 | / | 46.8 | 53.4 | 1.14 | 43 | |
OC6 | plasma | 5.1 | 26 | / | 24.6 | 24.6 | 1.00 | 74 |
ascites | 4.7 | 21 | / | 28.0 | 29.2 | 1.04 | 49 | |
ascitesF | 4.0 | 18 | 22.9 | 22.7 | 0.99 | 63 | ||
68 | 150 | 160 | 1.07 | 13 | ||||
ascites * | 5.6 | 27 | 28.7 | 29.0 | 1.01 | 18 | ||
150 | 143 | 165 | 1.10 | 15 | ||||
ascitesF * | 3.8 | 14 | 17.0 | 36.0 | (~2.1) | 56 | ||
62 | 101 | 115 | 1.14 | 34 | ||||
OC7 | plasma * | 4.1 | 20 | ~21 | ~32 | (~1.5) | 76 | |
173 | 188 | 185 | 0.99 | 11 | ||||
ascites * | 3.2 | 16 | 26.9 | 28.4 | 1.05 | 71 | ||
83 | 203 | 230 | 1.13 | 13 | ||||
ascitesF * | 4.5 | 20 | 22.3 | 33.4 | (~1.5) | 75 | ||
90 | 105 | 115 | 1.09 | 13 |
# for patient OC1 only preliminary DLS measurements at θ = 90° were collected; * analysis of thawed samples; ascitesF = filtered ascites; & for these particles, the analysis of angular dependency could not be performed; values in bold and italic in the “angular dependency” column are for peak 3.