Table 3.
Rh,90/nm | Angular Dependency (Peak 2) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient | Sample | Peak 1 | Peak 2 | Peak 3 | Rh,0/nm | Rg/nm | ρ | % Itot,90 |
BP-BOC1 | plasma | 6.1 | 31 | / | ~29 | / # | / # | 89 |
PF | 4.7 | 19 & | 123 | / & | / # | / # | 25 | |
BP-BOC2 | plasma | 3.3 | 17 | 107 | 24 | 26 | 1.1 | 76 |
PF | 2.9, 7.7 | 31 | / | 51 | 67 | 1.3 | 18 | |
BP-BOC3 | plasma | 4.3 | 18 | 102 | ~20 | / # | / # | 56 |
PF | 3.7, 13.5 | 42 | 390 | 36 | 68 | 1.9 | 24 | |
BP-BOC4 | plasma | 2.8, 7.2 | 36 | / | 28 | / # | / # | 69 |
PF | 3.3 | 13 | 63.0 | 29 | 55 | 1.9 | 23 | |
BP-BOC5 | plasma | 3.7 | 24 | / | 23 | 28 | 1.2 | 63 |
PF | 3.1, 10 | 34 | / | 40 | 51 | 1.3 | 22 |
# analysis of the angular dependency was not possible; & this peak likely does not correspond to ENPs; PF = peritoneal fluid.