Table 2. Comparison between OCTAVA and manual calculation of metrics.
Microfluidic device | Simulated OCTA MIP | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Metric (unit) | OCTAVA | Manual | Relative difference (%) | OCTAVA | Manual | Relative difference (%) |
Vessel area density (%) | 54 | 54 | 0 | 13 | 14 | 7 |
Vessel length density (%) | 2.16 | 2.16 | 0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0 |
Mean diameter (μm) | 185 | 169 | 9 | 113 | 110 | 3 |
Median diameter (μm) | 90 | 88 | 2 | 78 | 70 | 11 |
Branchpoint density (nodes/mm) | 1.6 | 1.7 | 6 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0 |
Fractal dimension | 1.35±0.36 | 1.22±0.36 | ||||
Mean tortuosity | 0.07 | 0.15 |