Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 24;12(9):e00404. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000404

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of predictive factors for ESD-associated bleeding at the time of treatment in nonelderly patients

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
Sex Men 1.633 1.248–2.138 <0.001 1.258 0.951–1.663 0.108
Ischemic heart disease Yes 4.542 3.507–5.883 <0.001 1.861 1.295–2.673 0.001
Liver cirrhosis Yes 1.749 0.962–3.178 0.067
Hemodialysis Yes 6.844 4.391–10.666 <0.001 4.363 2.652–7.178 <0.001
Aspirin Yes 3.467 2.698–4.454 <0.001 1.898 1.332–2.702 <0.001
Cilostazol Yes 1.811 1.019–3.220 0.043 1.400 0.736–2.663 0.305
Thienopyridine Yes 4.579 3.371–6.219 <0.001 3.205 2.012–5.105 <0.001
Warfarin Yes 6.613 4.773–9.162 <0.001 6.945 3.951–12.209 <0.001
DOAC Yes 5.301 3.683–7.631 <0.001 7.934 4.692–13.414 <0.001
Interruption of AT agents Yes 4.553 3.661–5.660 <0.001 0.709 0.454–1.107 0.130
Replacement of APAs Yes 2.925 1.499–5.709 0.002 0.760 0.350–1.651 0.488
Heparin bridging Yes 5.892 4.380–7.925 <0.001 1.011 0.622–1.643 0.965
Number of tumors Multiple 1.400 1.061–1.848 0.017 1.251 0.932–1.681 0.136
Tumor size >30 mm 1.616 1.230–2.124 0.001 1.763 1.322–2.350 <0.001
Tumor location Lower third 1.494 1.219–1.831 <0.001 1.597 1.287–1.981 <0.001
Tumor differentiation Undifferentiated 1.035 0.667–1.609 0.877

APA, antiplatelet agent; AT, antithrombotic; CI, confidence interval; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection; OR, odds ratio.