Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 24;12(9):e00404. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000404

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of predictive factors for ESD-associated bleeding at the time of treatment in elderly patients

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
Sex Men 1.330 0.838–2.111 0.227
Ischemic heart disease Yes 2.019 1.179–3.456 0.010 1.422 0.735–2.751 0.296
Liver cirrhosis Yes 1.029 0.243–4.357 0.969
Hemodialysis Yes 5.166 2.385–11.189 <0.001 4.591 2.056–10.248 <0.001
Aspirin Yes 1.683 1.026–2.763 0.039 1.370 0.753–2.492 0.303
Cilostazol Yes 1.893 0.842–4.253 0.122
Thienopyridine Yes 1.835 0.950–3.547 0.071
Warfarin Yes 4.186 2.329–7.526 <0.001 4.783 1.689–13.540 0.003
DOAC Yes 1.591 0.558–4.522 0.385
Interruption of AT agents Yes 1.503 0.909–2.484 0.112
Replacement of APAs Yes 1.976 0.686–5.686 0.207
Heparin bridging Yes 2.727 1.491–4.992 0.001 0.755 0.257–2.217 0.609
Number of tumors Multiple 1.617 0.968–2.700 0.168
Tumor size >30 mm 1.448 0.851–2.466 0.172
Tumor location Lower third 1.532 1.007–2.329 0.046 1.408 0.918–2.161 0.117
Tumor differentiation Undifferentiated 2.037 0.707–5.872 0.188

APA, antiplatelet agent; AT, antithrombotic; CI, confidence interval; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection; OR, odds ratio.