Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 2;2021:9774980. doi: 10.1155/2021/9774980

Table 2.

Effect of acute whole-body vibration exercise on handgrip strength, electromyographic records of the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle, and wrist range of motion (n = 21).

Variable Control Sham Vibration Within-interventions Between-interventions Interaction
p F η 2 Power p F η 2 Power p F η 2 Power
HS
Baseline (kg) 20.03 (16.52-23.54) 20.68 (17.29-24.07) 19.38 (16.18-22.58) 0.0014 13.70 0.86 1.00 0.3667 1.02 0.37 0.82 0.0178 4.24 0.73 0.99
After (kg) 20.45 (16.79-24.11) 20.95 (17.40-24.50) 21.77 (18.06-25.48)#
EMGrms
Baseline (% rms) 64.53 (57.77-71.29) 62.82 (56.83-62.81) 53.84 (46.93-60.79) 0.1821 1.91 0.34 0.76 0.0002 9.29 0.87 1.00 0.7403 0.30 0.17 0.39
After (% rms) 62.86 (55.64-70.08) 62.76 (56.81-68.71) 48.92 (39.34-58.50)#
FLEXION ROM
Baseline (°) 79.48 (75.70-83.26) 77.71 (73.58-81.84) 77.28 (73.36-81.20) 0.0059 9.48 0.77 0.99 0.6424 0.44 0.22 0.49 0.0086 5.05 0.76 0.99
After (°) 77.67 (73.62-81.72) 81.10 (77.17-85.03) 81.57 (76.91-86.23)#
Extension ROM
Baseline (°) 49.00 (41.37-56.63) 52.71 (44.50-60.92) 50.10 (42.86-57.34) 0.0064 9.28 0.84 1.00 0.0218 4.01 0.62 0.99 0.0404 3.34 0.58 0.99
After (°) 51.86 (46.19-57.53) 53.95 (45.18-62.72) 58.10 (51.85-64.35)#

HS: handgrip strength; EMGrms: electromyographic records; ROM: range of motion; whole-body vibration of 45 Hz/2 mm. Measures performed at baseline and after the experimental interventions. Data are presented as mean (95% confidence interval), F values, and eta partial η2. N = 21 subjects in each experimental test. ∗ represents the difference (p < 0.05) compared to baseline. # represents the difference (p < 0.05) between the interventions (after). There was no difference between the interventions at baseline.