Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 16;32(1):143–151. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08095-2

Table 2.

Diagnostic accuracy in proximal stenosis of ≥ 50% DS

Total TP TN FP FN Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Pos-LR Neg-LR
Per patient 1060 296 536 217 11 96.4 (93.5–98.1) 71.2 (67.8–74.4) 57.7 (54.9–60.5) 98.0 (96.5–98.9) 3.34 (2.98–3.75) 0.05 (0.03–0.09)
Per segment
-All segments(with non-evaluable) 4239 460 3342 391 46 90.9 (88.6–93.2) 89.5 (88.5–90.5) 54.1 (50.6–57.4) 98.6 (98.2–99.0) 8.68 (7.87–9.57) 0.10 (0.08–0.13)
Evaluable segments CTA Total TP TN FP FN Non-evaluable segments CTA Total ICA positive ICA negative ICA ND
-Proximal RCA 971 146 736 73 16 -Proximal RCA 89 13 76 0
-Left main 1028 29 934 57 8 -Left main 31 10 21 0
-Proximal LAD 992 120 706 150 16 -Proximal LAD 68 26 41 1
-Proximal rCX 977 82 778 111 6 -Proximal rCX 83 32 50 1

Diagnostic accuracy of CTA as compared with invasive coronary angiography for the detection of > 50% DS coronary lesions. Values between parentheses represent the outer bounds of the 95% confidence interval. Abbreviations: TP, true positives; TN, true negatives; FN, false negatives; FP, false positives; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; Pos-LR, positive likelihood ratio; Neg-LR, negative likelihood ratio; ICA, invasive coronary angiography; RCA, right coronary artery; LAD, left anterior descending artery; rCX, ramus circumflex; ND, non-evaluable