Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 9;7:62. doi: 10.1038/s41537-021-00189-6

Fig. 3. Interaction partners, affect, and motivation.

Fig. 3

a SZ networks of interaction partners, and affect were denser in the SZ group compared to HC. Link between interaction with others and happy is lacking in SZ, while strong link to anxiousness is evident. b Social motivation translates to interaction with other in HC but not SZ. Further, social motivation in SZ is highly connected (node centrality) and hence an excellent suggested candidate for intervention. Treatment providers are often associated with both motivation and anxiety in SZ.