Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jun 10;149(1):102–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.05.036

Table 2.

Unadjusted and adjusted associations of severe bronchiolitis metabotypes in infants with development of childhood asthma

Childhood asthma*
Unadjusted model
Adjusted model
Metabotypes Odds ratio (95% CI) P-value Odds ratio (95% CI) P-value
Metabotype A (GPC-high) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Metabotype B (amino acid-high, PUFA-low) 2.24 (1.10-4.63) 0.03 2.18 (1.03-4.71) 0.04
Metabotype C (amino acid-high, GP-low) 1.14 (0.65-2.08) 0.66 1.07 (0.58-2.02) 0.84
Metabotype D (GP-high) 1.23 (0.66-2.34) 0.52 1.25 (0.65-2.49) 0.51
Metabotype E (mixed) 1.12 (0.62-2.11) 0.72 0.87 (0.46-1.72) 0.69

Abbreviations: CI, confidential interval; GP, glycerophospholipid; GPC, glycerophosphocholine; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid.

*

Asthma was defined as physician-diagnosis of asthma by age 5 years, plus either asthma medication use (e.g., albuterol inhaler, inhaled corticosteroids, montelukast) or asthma-related symptoms in the preceding year. To examine the association between severe bronchiolitis metabotypes (metabotype A as the reference) and the risk of developing childhood asthma, logistic regression model was fit.

The multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders, including patient’s age, sex, parent history of asthma, number of previous breathing problems, respiratory syncytial vims infection, and rhinovirus infection.