Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 26;9:740946. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.740946

Table 2.

Comparison of implementers vs. non-implementers by organizational capacity domain.

Non-implementers N = 22 SDPI implementers N = 8 All N = 30 Significant difference (p-value)a
Workforce and human resources
Number of staff employed, Mean SD 53.5 63.8 117.0 86.9 68.8 73.7 0.02
Number of physicians (MDs/DOs) employed, Mean SD 2.2 4.1 4.3 4.5 2.8 4.2 0.03
Number of non-physician clinicians (PAs/NPs) employed, Mean SD 2.1 2.8 4.1 2.9 2.7 2.9 0.03
Certified diabetes educator, N % 8 36.4% 5 62.5% 13 43.3% 0.24
Registered dietitian, N % 12 54.6% 8 100.0% 20 66.7% 0.03
Physical activity specialist, N % 8 36.4% 3 37.5% 11 36.7% 1.00
Health educator/Lifestyle counselor, N % 14 66.7% 7 87.5% 21 72.4% 0.38
Community health worker, N % 13 59.1% 6 75.0% 19 63.3% 0.67
Nurses (RN, BSN, or MSN), N % 15 68.2% 8 100.0% 23 76.7% 0.14
Public health or epidemiology, N % 8 36.4% 2 28.6% 10 34.5% 1.00
Existing vacancies that affect patient care, N % 16 72.7% 6 75.0% 22 73.3% 1.00
Fiscal and economic resources
Total revenue in thousandsb, Median IQR 2,519 1,433–7,169 9,830 5,807–20,453 3,378 1,825–10,939 0.01
Revenue less expenses in thousandsb, Median IQR 112 2–312 244 33–880 112 26–576 0.53
Operating marginb, Median IQR 4.1% 0.2–10.7% 1.3% 0.9–6.0% 3.7% 0.8–10.7% 0.73
Percent of revenue from government grantsb, Median IQR 75.7% 52.4–91.8% 56.8% 39.0–69.9% 68.8% 52.4–91.4% 0.22
Percent revenue from program servicesb, Median IQR 16.2% 3.7–57.6% 37.2% 27.4–57.7% 23.3% 3.7–57.6% 0.24
Available funding for diabetes prevention and care, N % 17 77.3% 7 87.5% 24 80.0% 1.00
Funding specifically dedicated for diabetes prevention and care, N % 18 81.8% 6 75.0% 24 80.0% 0.65
Sufficient funding for my organization's diabetes programs, N % 9 40.9% 4 50.0% 13 43.3% 0.70
Physical infrastructure
Space to facilitate group education classes on-site, N % 21 95.5% 8 100.0% 29 96.7% 1.00
Equipment for nutrition education (e.g., kitchen), N % 15 68.2% 6 75.0% 21 70.0% 1.00
Physical activity equipment on-site, N % 13 59.1% 5 62.5% 18 60.0% 1.00
Laboratory collection and testing equipment, N % 17 77.3% 8 100.0% 25 83.3% 0.29
Pharmacy, N % 4 18.2% 3 37.5% 7 23.3% 0.34
Data and informational resources
Use an EHR system, N % 22 100.0% 8 100.0% 30 100.0% NA
Reliable access to the internet, N % 22 100.0% 8 100.0% 30 100.0% NA
Uses paper charts, N % 15 68.2% 4 50.0% 19 63.3% 0.42
Current registry that identifies and tracks patients with type 2 diabetes, N % 21 95.5% 7 87.5% 28 93.3% 0.47
Ability to systematically identify patients who have pre-diabetes, N % 16 76.2% 8 100.0% 24 82.8% 0.28
EHR provides historical reports on patients' lab results, N % 16 72.7% 7 87.5% 23 76.7% 0.64
EHR provides reports on preventive health measures (e.g., physical activity, diet), N % 16 72.7% 6 75.0% 22 73.3% 1.00
EHR is able to generate reminders about diabetes care targeted at the provider, N % 16 72.7% 6 75.0% 22 73.3% 1.00
System boundaries and size
UIHO is a FQHC, N % 5 22.7% 5 62.5% 10 33.3% 0.08
Approximate number of patients served in a fiscal year, Mean SD 4,540 6,627 8,382 7,644 5,638 7,013 0.04
Approximate number of patients receiving care with type 2 diabetesc, Mean SD 272 280 593 513 362 378 0.05
Percentage of patients that identify as AI/ANc, Mean SD 71.9% 33.5% 53.9% 34.4% 67.2% 34.0% 0.15
Percentage of patients that prefer a language other than Englishc, Mean SD 7.0% 11.1% 13.7% 24.3% 8.7% 15.3% 0.48
Location of my facility is accessible to patients, N % 22 100.0% 8 100.0% 30 100.0% NA
Assist patients with transportation costs, N % 18 81.8% 8 100.0% 26 86.7% 0.55
Agreements with other community-based organizations for patients to use relevant services not available at the clinic (e.g., nutrition/meals, physical activity, housing, financial needs, etc.), N % 17 77.3% 7 87.5% 24 80.0% 1.00
Policies and procedures are in place for identifying specialty referrals, N % 22 100.0% 8 100.0% 30 100% NA
Inter-organizational relationships, governance and decision-making structure
Organization is in regular communication with the Indian Health Service, N % 21 95.5% 8 100.0% 29 96.7% 1.00
Organization has a working relationship with its Board of Directors, N % 21 95.5% 7 87.5% 28 93.3% 0.47
Community stakeholders participate in the organization's decision-making process, N % 15 68.2% 8 100.0% 23 76.7% 0.14
Organization uses patient/family feedback to improve the quality of our services, N % 22 100.0% 8 100.0% 30 100.0% NA
Organizational culture
Staff at my organization have high morale, N % 18 81.8% 8 100.0% 26 86.7% 0.55
Clinic leadership is supportive of diabetes care and prevention services, N % 22 100.0% 8 100.0% 30 100.0% NA
Most staff are AI/AN, N % 16 72.7% 4 50.0% 20 66.7% 0.38
Programs and departments often collaborate, N % 22 100.0% 8 100.0% 30 100.0% NA
Organization leadership is visible and accessible, N % 21 95.5% 8 100.0% 29 96.7% 1.00
Organization is trusted by patients, N % 21 95.5% 7 87.5% 28 93.3% 0.47
Family members/care givers are encouraged to participate in health education activities, N % 21 95.5% 7 87.5% 28 93.3% 0.47

SD, Standard Deviation; IQR, Inter-quartile range; MD, Doctor of Medicine; DO, Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine; PA, Physician Assistant; NP, Nurse Practitioner; RN, Registered Nurse; BSN, Bachelor of Science in Nursing; MSN, Master of Science in Nursing; EHR, Electronic Health Record; FQHC, Federally Qualified Health Center.

a

Fisher's exact tests and Kruskal-Wallis exact tests were used for identifying significant differences across groups for binary and continuous variables, respectively. Tests were not computed for questions for which all UIHOs answered identically.

b

Data come from the IRS Form 990 for whichever reporting period contains April-May 2017.

c

Question had 3–5 organizations with a missing response.