Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 26;76(2):41–50. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13306

Table 3.

Subgroup analyses of the prevalence of anxiety and depression

Groups Subgroups Anxiety Depression
No. studies 25 15
No. samples 32 20
No. prevalence 58 39
Total no. participants 20 352 13 960
Overall 22%, 95% CI: 19%–27%, I2: 99.9% 16%, 95% CI: 12%–20%, I2: 99.9%
Population Frontline HCW 23%, 95% CI: 13%–34%, I2: 98.1% 14%, 95% CI: 5%–25%, I2: 98.5%
General HCW 18%, 95% CI: 12%–80%, I2: 98.1% 15%, 95% CI: 10%–21%, I2: 97.5%
General population 31%, 95% CI: 20%–44%, I2:99.7% 16%, 95% CI: 6%–29%, I2:99.7%
Student 18%, 95% CI: 8%–32%, I2:99.4% 23%, 95% CI: 10–39%
Severity Mild 29%, 95% CI: 21%–37%, I2: 99.1% 21%, 95% CI: 16–28%, I2: 98.2%
Moderate 25%, 95% CI: 18%–33%, I2: 98.9% 14%, 95% CI: 10%–19%, I2: 96.6%
Severe 8%, 95% CI: 5%–11%, I2: 95.5% 7%, 95% CI: 5%–10%, I2: 87.9%
Instrument DASS‐21 17%, 95% CI: 12%–24%, I2: 98.7% 14%, 95% CI: 10%–18%, I2: 97.7%
GAD‐7 21%, 95% CI: 12–31%, I2: 99.6% NA
HADS 25%, 95% CI: 14–39%, I2: 97.8% 18%, 95% CI: 7%–33%, I2: 98.1%
Region Continental 22%, 95% CI: 17%–27%, I2: 99.3% 17%, 95% CI: 13%–22%, I2: 98.9%
Malay Archipelago 25%, 95% CI: 10%–45%, I2: 99.1% 7%, 95% CI: 2%–16%, I2: 96.5%

I2 statistic indicates the heterogeneity.

CI, confidence interval.