Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 19;26(12):1689–1699. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13685

TABLE 4.

Cox proportional hazards model for 28‐day clinical improvement among severe or critical COVID‐19 following Tocilizumab versus standard‐of‐care treatments

Unadjusted HR (95% CI) p‐value
Tocilizumab (vs. standard of care) 6.739 (3.168–14.33) <0.001*
Adjusted HR (95% CI) p‐value
Tocilizumab (vs. standard of care) 4.936 (2.033–12.0) <0.001*
Age (years) 0.99 (0.956–1.032) 0.726
Charlson's comorbidity score 0.65 (0.428–0.988) 0.044*
Time to hospital admission (days) 0.75 (0.613–0.927) 0.007*
Need for invasive ventilation (yes vs. no) 0.38 (0.157–0.905) 0.029*
Glucocorticoids therapy (yes vs. no) 0.54 (0.200–1.476) 0.232
PaO2:FiO2 ratio 1.02 (1.005– 1.031) 0.009*
CRP (mg/L) 1.00 (0.997–1.004) 0.817
D‐Dimer (ng/ml) 1.00 (1.000–1.000) 0.077
AST (IU/L) 0.99 (0.961–1.010) 0.234
Platelets (×103) 0.99 (0.996–1.002) 0.554
Haemoglobin (g/L) 0.99 (0.973–1.020) 0.760

Abbreviations: AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CI, confidence interval; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019; CRP, C‐reactive protein; HR, hazard ratio.

*Statistically significant HR (p < 0.05).

a

−2 Log likelihood = 275.7; Chi‐square (df = 13) = 67.1; p < 0.001.