Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2021 Oct 12;238:108–120. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.10.005

Table 2.

Effect of real iTBS v/s sham iTBS on symptom severity.

Measure Timepoint Real iTBSa Mean (SE) Sham iTBSa Mean (SE) F(df) (Group effect) p (Group effect) F(df) (Time effect) p (Time effect) F(df) (Group * Time effect) p (Group * Time effect)
Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Baseline 86.35 (2.5) 84.89 (2.93) 1.144 (1,62.39) 0.289 31.604 (2,110.99) <0.001 0.511 (2,110.98) 0.602
Day6 77.69 (2.5) 73.72 (2.93)
Week6 76.4 (2.7) 71.97 (3.0)
Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) Baseline 5.24 (1.36) 7.41 (1.6) 1.246 (1,57.10) 0.269 9.675 (2,105.74) <0.001 0.082 (2,105.73) 0.921
Day6 2.64 (1.36) 4.69 (1.6)
Week6 4.7 (1.45) 6.2 (1.63)
Calgary Depression Scale in Schizophrenia (CDSS) Baseline 1.17 (0.43) 1.49 (0.49) 0.074 (1,58.79) 0.787 4.54 (2,106.34) 0.013 1.913 (2,106.33) 0.153
Day6 0.34 (0.43) 0.59 (0.49)
Week6 1.44 (0.48) 0.48 (0.51)

df = degrees of freedom, SE = standard error.

iTBS = intermittent theta burst stimulation.

p is significant at </=0.05

a

Estimated marginal means reported.