Table 5:

Description of the results previously published in the PUMA uranium miner cohorts for lung cancer risks

Study (reference number)	Workers	Lung cancer deaths	SMR [95%CI]	ERR/100 WLM (95%CI)
Eldorado, Beaverlodge (20)	9,498	279	1.28 [1.13–1.43]	0.96 [0.56, 1.56]
Eldorado, Port Radium (20)	3,047	230	1.63 [1.42–1.84]	0.37 [0.23, 0.59]
Ontario (21)	28,546	1,230	1.34 [1.27–1.42]	0.64 [0.43–0.85]
Czech (25)	9,978	1141	3.47 [3.27, 3.67]	0.97 [0.74–1.27]a
France (22)	5,086	211	1.34 [1.16–1.53]	0.71 [0.31–1.30]
Wismut (53)	58,987	3,942	1.95 [1.90–2.01]	0.19 [0.16–0.22]
Colorado Plateau (24)	4,137	549	4.96 [4.55–5.39]	N.E.b
New Mexico (23)	3,469	68	4.00 [3.1–5.1]	1.8 [0.7–5.4]

^aERR [CI 90%]

^bN.E.: not estimated, but trend tests with cumulative radon exposure categories were positive and significant

^cAll data include workers of the Port Hope radium and uranium refinery and processing facility, which would be excluded from the PUMA analysis.

^dFrom CNSC report ⁶⁷.