Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 15;8(4):e29610. doi: 10.2196/29610

Table 2.

Brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies for adaptive assistive mobility devices.

Brain signals and auxiliary sensors Classifier for feature extraction Output command Contributions Drawbacks
P300 (laser scanner) [74] Stepwise linear discriminant analysis A predefined set of locations and stops High accuracy, no training required, and autonomous navigation after successful selection Low information transfer rate, predefined paths, limited testing scenarios, and possible fatigue after long focus period of the eye on the target stimulus
P300 (odometer, barcode scanner, and a proximity sensor) [38] Support vector machine A predefined set of locations and stops Same as Rebsamen et al [38] Same as Rebsamen et al [38] and a modified environment requires an update of the guiding path
MIa-based mu rhythm and the P300 [39] One versus the rest common spatial patterns transformation matrix Left, right, accelerate, and decelerate Improved performance Limited testing scenarios and possible fatigue after long focus period of the eye on the target stimulus
MI-based BCI (10 sonar sensors and 2 webcams) [41] Gaussian classifier Left, right, and keep moving forward Spontaneous and shared control Limited testing scenarios, requires extensive training, and limited classes (typically three)
Steady-state visual evoked potentials (camera and adaptive fuzzy controller) [42] Frequency recognition algorithm based on multivariable synchronization index Left, right, upwards, and downwards Teleoperation control of an exoskeleton using a brain-machine interface Possible fatigue after a long focus period of the eye on a target stimulus and a significant reduction in recognition accuracy for inexperienced subjects
Steady-state somatosensory evoked potential [40] Regularized linear discriminant analysis Turn left, turn right, and move forward Spontaneous, first of its kind, and addressed the possible fatigue after a long focus period of the eye on the target stimulus Only healthy subjects were used, with limited testing scenarios (two)

aMI: motor imagery.