Table 1.
GRADE Framework consisting of four grades of quality of evidence and two grades of strength of recommendation
GRADE Framework | |
---|---|
| |
A. Quality of evidence | |
High quality | Well performed randomized control trials or clear evidence from multiple well-conducted observational studies showing very large effect |
Moderate quality | Randomized control trials with essential limitations |
Low quality | Observational studies or controlled trial with severe limitations |
Very low quality | Non-systematic observations, biologic reasoning, or observational studies with severe limitations |
| |
B. Strength of recommendation | |
| |
Strong | A strong recommendation was given when benefits distinctly outweighed the risks for nearly all patients. As practitioners, most patients must receive this course of action |
Weak | A weak recommendation was given when risks and benefits were more closely balanced or were uncertain. As practitioners, patients must be explained about all the different options, and an option suitable for patient needs must be chosen |