Table 1. Comparison of SAR values predicted using the VHP-Female surface CAD model with the values predicted by a 5 mm voxel model derived from the identical image dataset [71].

Nearly identical high-pass birdcage coil dimensions, coil landmark, and excitation type were used. All results are normalized to 1 μT ${\mathit{B}}_1^{+}$ field at the coil center.

Source	Method	Model	Coil landmark	Whole-body SAR	Max. non-averaged local SAR	Max. 1g local SAR	Max. 10g local SAR
Present report	FEM—1 adaptive pass (Ansys)	CAD VHP-Fem. v. 3.0 88 kg 64 MHz	Shoulder/heart (top of vert. T7)	0.16	44.5	5.22	2.61
Present report	FEM—8 adaptive passes (Ansys)	CAD VHP-Fem. v. 3.0 88 kg 64 MHz	Shoulder/heart (top of vert. T7)	0.13	12.0	1.61	1.37
Ref. [71]	FDTD Voxel size 5 mm	Voxel Vis. Human Female 64 MHz	Heart	0.12	NA	1.78	NA