Study and year of publication |
Study type |
Purpose of study |
Result/conclusion |
Rashwan et al., 2019 [13] |
Cross-sectional study |
To determine the validity of biomarkers in screening for NS |
CRP—more valuable in late-onset NS. PCT, presepsin, and hs-CRP, when used together, were early diagnostic markers for NS |
Eschborn and Weitkamp, 2019 [14] |
Systematic review |
Review of kinetics and performance of PCT and CRP for diagnosis of NS |
PCT and CRP perform better when measured serially to be used along with other clinical and laboratory data for initiation/stoppage of antibiotics |
Ruan et al., 2018 [15] |
Systematic review and meta-analysis |
To evaluate the accuracy of diagnosis of NS using PCT and CRP combined or presepsin alone |
PCT and CRP together improves the accuracy of the diagnosis of NS |
Sharma et al., 2018 [16] |
Literature review |
Review of biomarkers for diagnosis of NS |
CRP, PCT—most commonly used as sepsis markers. There is still a need to find an ideal biomarker |
Liu et al., 2019 [17] |
Meta-analysis |
To assess the accuracy of CRP in neonatal septicemia |
CRP can be used in detecting NS. But serum PCT has high specificity and sensitivity in diagnosing early NS |
Thota et al., 2016 [18] |
Observational study |
To evaluate the role of PCT in the diagnosis of NS |
PCT has a better correlation with confirmed sepsis. Therefore, it should be included in a full sepsis evaluation |