Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 11;3(1):28–41.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2021.12.002

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Test-negative case-control analysis to compare the odds of symptomatic infection after vaccination with mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2

(A) The primary analysis was conducted as a test-negative case-control study, with positive symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests considered as cases and negative symptomatic tests considered as controls. We compared the odds of symptomatic infection after full vaccination with mRNA-1273 versus after full vaccination with BNT162b2, while adjusting for clinical and demographic covariates.

(B) Odds ratios (ORs) of symptomatic infection obtained in the crude analysis (top) and in the adjusted analysis using conditional logistic regression (CLR) (bottom). In each case, ORs are shown for the entire study duration (December 1, 2020 through September 22, 2021), the early epoch (December 1, 2020 through May 31, 2021), and the late epoch (July 1, 2021 through September 22, 2021). The x axis is log-transformed such that, for example, ORs of 0.5 and 2 are equidistant from the null hypothesis odds ratio of 1. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

(C) Estimated effectiveness of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 against symptomatic infection in the early epoch and the late epoch. In each time period, effectiveness estimates were derived by comparing the odds of symptomatic infection after full vaccination versus during the 10 days after the first dose. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.