Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 3;14:100372. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2021.100372

Table 2.

Regression analyses examining the interaction between bias and contact.

Step 1
Step 2
Step 3


Variable B SE 95% CI B SE 95% CI B SE 95% CI
Gender 0.182 0.121 −0.055, 0.420 0.126 0.096 −0.063, 0.315 0.137 0.096 −0.052, 0.325
Age 0.010 0.006 −0.002, 0.023 0.001 0.005 −0.009, 0.011 −0.002 0.005 −0.012, 0.009
Work hours −0.006 0.004 −0.014, 0.001 0.001 0.003 −0.005, 0.007 0.001 0.003 −0.004, 0.007
Tenure −0.027*** 0.007 −0.040, −0.013 −0.008 0.006 −0.019, 0.003 −0.006 0.006 −0.018, 0.005
Current Prescribing −0.181 0.160 −0.496, 0.133 −0.050 0.128 −0.301, 0.201 −0.082 0.128 −0.334, 0.169
Past Prescribing 0.252 0.300 −0.338, 0.842 0.045 0.239 −0.425, 0.516 0.090 0.239 −0.379, 0.560
R2 = 0.075
Bias −0.761*** 0.065 −0.888, −0.634 −0.627*** 0.090 −0.803, −0.450
Contact 0.012*** 0.002 0.007, 0.016 0.030** 0.009 0.012, 0.047
R2 (ΔR2) = 0.418 (0.344)
Bias * Contact −0.007* 0.003 −0.014, −0.001
R2 (ΔR2) = 0.427 (0.009)

Note: N = 316; * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001.