Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Jun 11;133:108533. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108533

Table 3.

Difference in odds of MOUD use between White and Black clients in expansion vs. non-expansion states by subgroup.

Reference population: White clients, pre-ACA All
Criminal justice referral
Medicaid
Expansion states
Non-expansion states
Expansion states
Non-expan states
Expansion states
Non-expansion states
aOR 99% CI aOR 99% CI aOR 99% CI aOR 99% CI aOR 99% CI aOR 99% CI

Black clients, pre-ACA 0.88*** 0.85, 0.91 0.86*** 0.77, 0.95 1 21*** 1.06, 1.38 0.38*** 0.19, 0.74 0.56*** 0.50, 0.63 1 79*** 1.38, 2.33
White clients, post-ACA 1.33*** 1.29, 1.39 1.07 0.98, 1.16 1.89*** 1.64, 2.17 0.93 0.65, 1.33 1.13** 1.01, 1.27 0.91 0.72, 1.15
Black clients, post-ACA 1.16*** 1.10, 1.22 1.13 0.99, 1.30 1.69*** 1.41, 2.04 0.43*** 0.20, 0.93 0 73*** 0.64, 0.83 1.51** 1.09, 2.10
Difference in odds ratios (Black#post-ACA) 0.98 0.94, 1.03 1 24*** 1.07, 1.44 0.74*** 0.62, 0.89 1.21 0.46, 3.19 1.16*** 1.03, 1.30 0.93 0.72, 1.15

Notes: We adjusted regressions for census region-fixed effects and episode level characteristics like gender, age group, homelessness, educational attainment, service setting, polysubstance use, heroin use, and referral source.

***

Indicates significant change at p < 0.001.

**

Indicates significant change at p < 0.01.