Table 2.
Comparison of ARGO performance in the whole vs. the top 50 reportsa.
| PRECISION (P) = TP/(TP + FP) | RECALL (R) = TP/(TP + FN) | F1-SCORE = 2*(P*R)/(P + R) | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All reports, N = 239 | Top reports, N = 50a | Diff | All reports, N = 239 | Top reports, N = 50a | Diff | All reports, N =239 | Top reports N = 50a | Diff | |||||||||||||
| DATA-FIELD | TP, N | FP, N | TP + FP | P, % | TP, N | FP, N | TP + FP, N | P, % | % | TP, N | FN, N | TP + FN, N | R, % | TP, N | FN, N | TP + FN, N | R, % | % | F1, % | F1, % | % |
| MYC | 20 | 0 | 20 | 100.0 | 13 | 0 | 13 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1 | 13 | 4 | 17 | 69.2 | 12.1 | 72.7 | 81.8 | 9.1 |
| BCL2 | 130 | 2 | 132 | 98.5 | 28 | 0 | 28 | 100.0 | 1.5 | 130 | 55 | 185 | 71.4 | 28 | 5 | 33 | 84.8 | 13.4 | 82.2 | 91.8 | 9.6 |
| BCL6 | 115 | 1 | 116 | 99.1 | 27 | 0 | 27 | 100.0 | 0.9 | 115 | 51 | 166 | 61.5 | 27 | 5 | 32 | 84.4 | 22.9 | 75.9 | 91.5 | 15.6 |
| CD10 | 95 | 3 | 98 | 96.9 | 25 | 0 | 25 | 100.0 | 3.1 | 95 | 75 | 170 | 55.9 | 25 | 7 | 32 | 78.1 | 22.2 | 70.9 | 87.7 | 16.8 |
| CD20 | 164 | 1 | 165 | 99.4 | 36 | 0 | 36 | 100.0 | 0.6 | 164 | 51 | 215 | 76.3 | 36 | 3 | 39 | 92.3 | 16.0 | 86.3 | 96.9 | 10.6 |
| Cyclin D1 | 58 | 0 | 58 | 100.0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 58 | 23 | 81 | 71.6 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5 | -9.1 | 83.5 | 76.3 | -7.2 |
| – | Mean (std) | 1.0 (1.2) | Mean (std) | 12.9 (11.7) | Mean (std) | 9.1 (8.6) | |||||||||||||||
ARGO: Automatic Record Generator for Onco-hematology, TP: True Positive, FP: False Positive, FN: False Negative, CD: Cluster of Differentiation, Diff: difference, std: standard deviation.
aTop 50 reports (internal series) with the highest optical resolution.