Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 10;5(4):txab211. doi: 10.1093/tas/txab211

Table 8.

The effect of creep feed composition and form and nursery diet complexity on apparent ileal digestibility (AID) and apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of nutrients and energy after weaning

Creep1 Nursery2 P-value3
COM LMR PMR NO SEM4 HIGH LOW SEM4 CREEP NURSERY
No.5 14 14 14 14 28 28
AID, %
 Phase I
  Organic matter 66.4 63.6 68.3 67.8 3.8 68.8 64.2 2.5 0.574 0.076
  Crude protein 53.9 53.2 58.1 54.1 5.5 56.1 53.6 4.8 0.745 0.463
 Phase III
  Organic matter 64.2 63.0 61.7 61.7 2.3 63.2 62.1 2.0 0.792 0.583
  Crude protein 74.8 72.1 72.6 72.0 1.8 74.5 71.6 1.3 0.583 0.108
ATTD
 Phase III
  Organic matter, % 77.5 81.5 81.3 80.0 1.5 79.8 80.3 1.4 0.199 0.699
  GE, % 78.4 82.3 80.8 82.5 1.7 80.6 81.5 1.3 0.180 0.536
  DE, kcal/kg 3,548 3,723 3,653 3,729 73 3,627 3,700 52 0.199 0.255

1Creep feed treatments: commercial creep feed from Floradale Feed Mill (Floradale, ON, Canada; micropellets; COM), liquid milk replacer (LMR), and pelleted milk replacer (micropellets; PMR) from Grober Nutrition (Cambridge, ON, Canada), or no creep feed offered (NO). Creep feed treatments were implemented at 5.4 ± 0.3 days of age and until weaning (21.3 ± 2.1 days of age).

2Nursery feed treatments: HIGH, nursery diets that contained protein from plant and animal sources; LOW, nursery diets with corn and soybean meal as the main protein sources. Diets were fed for 7, 14, and 17 days in phases I, II, and III, respectively.

3 P-values for the main effects of creep (CREEP) and nursery dietary treatment (NURSERY).

4Maximum value for the standard error of the means.

5Number litters evaluated.